Hunter 140 vs Trac 14
How do the Hunter 140 and Trac 14 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 140 | Hunter 140 | Trac 14 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 14.1 ft4.29 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 7.5 ft2.29 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 0.6 ft0.18 m |
| Displacement | 225 lb102 kg | 195 lb88 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 102 ft²9.5 m² | 148 ft²13.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 44.12 | 70.42 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 3.83 | 5.17 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Hunter 140 vs Trac 14: the short version
- The Hunter 140 and Trac 14 are close in length (14.0 ft4.27 m vs 14.1 ft4.29 m ).
- The Hunter 140 is heavier, displacing about 15% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Trac 14 carries the more powerful rig (70.4 vs 44.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 140 rates better for offshore work (3.83 vs 5.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.