Hunter 146 vs Hunter 18.5
How do the Hunter 146 and Hunter 18.5 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 146 | Hunter 146 | Hunter 18.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 18.4 ft5.61 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 15.5 ft4.72 m |
| Beam | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 7.1 ft2.16 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 2.0 ft0.61 m |
| Displacement | 340 lb154 kg | 1,600 lb726 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 520 lb236 kg |
| Sail area | 92 ft²8.5 m² | 152 ft²14.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 30.22 | 17.78 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 192 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 11.1 |
| Capsize screening | 3.73 | 2.42 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.3 |
Hunter 146 vs Hunter 18.5: the short version
- The Hunter 18.5 is the larger boat at 18.4 ft5.61 m LOA versus 14.5 ft4.42 m for the Hunter 146.
- The Hunter 18.5 is heavier, displacing about 371% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 146 carries the more powerful rig (30.2 vs 17.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 18.5 rates better for offshore work (2.42 vs 3.73).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.