Hunter 146 vs Hunter 19-1
How do the Hunter 146 and Hunter 19-1 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 146 | Hunter 146 | Hunter 19-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 18.7 ft5.69 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 14.6 ft4.44 m |
| Beam | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 7.3 ft2.23 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 340 lb154 kg | 1,250 lb567 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 92 ft²8.5 m² | 156 ft²14.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 30.22 | 21.51 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 180 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 8.6 |
| Capsize screening | 3.73 | 2.72 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.1 |
Hunter 146 vs Hunter 19-1: the short version
- The Hunter 19-1 is the larger boat at 18.7 ft5.69 m LOA versus 14.5 ft4.42 m for the Hunter 146.
- The Hunter 19-1 is heavier, displacing about 268% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 146 carries the more powerful rig (30.2 vs 21.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 19-1 rates better for offshore work (2.72 vs 3.73).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.