Hunter 146 vs Hunter 23
How do the Hunter 146 and Hunter 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 146 
Hunter 23 | Hunter 146 | Hunter 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 23.3 ft7.09 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 19.6 ft5.97 m |
| Beam | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 2.3 ft0.69 m |
| Displacement | 340 lb154 kg | 2,450 lb1,111 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 800 lb363 kg |
| Sail area | 92 ft²8.5 m² | 236 ft²21.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 30.22 | 20.78 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 146 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 11.5 |
| Capsize screening | 3.73 | 2.37 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.9 |
Hunter 146 vs Hunter 23: the short version
- The Hunter 23 is the larger boat at 23.3 ft7.09 m LOA versus 14.5 ft4.42 m for the Hunter 146.
- The Hunter 23 is heavier, displacing about 621% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 146 carries the more powerful rig (30.2 vs 20.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 23 rates better for offshore work (2.37 vs 3.73).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.