Hunter 146 vs Hunter 27 Edge
How do the Hunter 146 and Hunter 27 Edge compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 146 | Hunter 146 | Hunter 27 Edge | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 26.4 ft8.03 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 24.2 ft7.37 m |
| Beam | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 8.3 ft2.54 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 340 lb154 kg | 3,450 lb1,565 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 1,600 lb726 kg |
| Sail area | 92 ft²8.5 m² | 288 ft²26.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 30.22 | 20.18 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 109 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 12.7 |
| Capsize screening | 3.73 | 2.21 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 6.6 |
Hunter 146 vs Hunter 27 Edge: the short version
- The Hunter 27 Edge is the larger boat at 26.4 ft8.03 m LOA versus 14.5 ft4.42 m for the Hunter 146.
- The Hunter 27 Edge is heavier, displacing about 915% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 146 carries the more powerful rig (30.2 vs 20.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 27 Edge rates better for offshore work (2.21 vs 3.73).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.