Hunter 146 vs Hunter 35 Legend
How do the Hunter 146 and Hunter 35 Legend compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 146 | Hunter 146 | Hunter 35 Legend | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 35.6 ft10.84 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 29.8 ft9.07 m |
| Beam | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 11.8 ft3.58 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 340 lb154 kg | 12,100 lb5,488 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 4,600 lb2,087 kg |
| Sail area | 92 ft²8.5 m² | 593 ft²55.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 30.22 | 18.00 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 205 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 22.3 |
| Capsize screening | 3.73 | 2.05 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 7.3 |
Hunter 146 vs Hunter 35 Legend: the short version
- The Hunter 35 Legend is the larger boat at 35.6 ft10.84 m LOA versus 14.5 ft4.42 m for the Hunter 146.
- The Hunter 35 Legend is heavier, displacing about 3459% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 146 carries the more powerful rig (30.2 vs 18.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 35 Legend rates better for offshore work (2.05 vs 3.73).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.