Hunter 146 vs Hunter 40.5
How do the Hunter 146 and Hunter 40.5 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 146 | Hunter 146 | Hunter 40.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 40.2 ft12.24 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 35.3 ft10.77 m |
| Beam | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 12.4 ft3.79 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 340 lb154 kg | 20,000 lb9,072 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 7,000 lb3,175 kg |
| Sail area | 92 ft²8.5 m² | 760 ft²70.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 30.22 | 16.50 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 202 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 29.3 |
| Capsize screening | 3.73 | 1.83 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 8.0 |
Hunter 146 vs Hunter 40.5: the short version
- The Hunter 40.5 is the larger boat at 40.2 ft12.24 m LOA versus 14.5 ft4.42 m for the Hunter 146.
- The Hunter 40.5 is heavier, displacing about 5782% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 146 carries the more powerful rig (30.2 vs 16.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 40.5 rates better for offshore work (1.83 vs 3.73).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.