Hunter 146 vs Marlow-Hunter 22
How do the Hunter 146 and Marlow-Hunter 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 146 | Hunter 146 | Marlow-Hunter 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 21.3 ft6.50 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 18.8 ft5.71 m |
| Beam | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 340 lb154 kg | 1,700 lb771 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 500 lb227 kg |
| Sail area | 92 ft²8.5 m² | 215 ft²20.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 30.22 | 24.15 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 115 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 8.5 |
| Capsize screening | 3.73 | 2.65 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.8 |
Hunter 146 vs Marlow-Hunter 22: the short version
- The Marlow-Hunter 22 is the larger boat at 21.3 ft6.50 m LOA versus 14.5 ft4.42 m for the Hunter 146.
- The Marlow-Hunter 22 is heavier, displacing about 400% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 146 carries the more powerful rig (30.2 vs 24.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Marlow-Hunter 22 rates better for offshore work (2.65 vs 3.73).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.