Hunter 146 vs Moorings 295
How do the Hunter 146 and Moorings 295 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 146 | Hunter 146 | Moorings 295 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 29.5 ft8.99 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Beam | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 340 lb154 kg | 7,500 lb3,402 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 2,680 lb1,216 kg |
| Sail area | 92 ft²8.5 m² | 400 ft²37.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 30.22 | 16.70 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 170 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 18.2 |
| Capsize screening | 3.73 | 2.15 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 7.0 |
Hunter 146 vs Moorings 295: the short version
- The Moorings 295 is the larger boat at 29.5 ft8.99 m LOA versus 14.5 ft4.42 m for the Hunter 146.
- The Moorings 295 is heavier, displacing about 2106% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 146 carries the more powerful rig (30.2 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Moorings 295 rates better for offshore work (2.15 vs 3.73).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.