Hunter 146 vs Rascal 14
How do the Hunter 146 and Rascal 14 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 146 | Hunter 146 | Rascal 14 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 14.4 ft4.40 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 13.8 ft4.22 m |
| Beam | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 340 lb154 kg | 400 lb181 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 92 ft²8.5 m² | 121 ft²11.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 30.22 | 35.66 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 68 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 4.1 |
| Capsize screening | 3.73 | 3.26 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.0 |
Hunter 146 vs Rascal 14: the short version
- The Hunter 146 and Rascal 14 are close in length (14.5 ft4.42 m vs 14.4 ft4.40 m ).
- The Rascal 14 is heavier, displacing about 18% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Rascal 14 carries the more powerful rig (35.7 vs 30.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Rascal 14 rates better for offshore work (3.26 vs 3.73).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.