Hunter 146 vs Skipjack 15
How do the Hunter 146 and Skipjack 15 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 146 | Hunter 146 | Skipjack 15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 14.6 ft4.44 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 3.8 ft1.17 m |
| Displacement | 340 lb154 kg | 340 lb154 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 92 ft²8.5 m² | 125 ft²11.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 30.22 | 41.06 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 3.73 | 3.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Hunter 146 vs Skipjack 15: the short version
- The Hunter 146 and Skipjack 15 are close in length (14.5 ft4.42 m vs 14.6 ft4.44 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Skipjack 15 carries the more powerful rig (41.1 vs 30.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Skipjack 15 rates better for offshore work (3.01 vs 3.73).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.