Hunter 170 vs Hunter 23
How do the Hunter 170 and Hunter 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 170 
Hunter 23 | Hunter 170 | Hunter 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 17.1 ft5.21 m | 23.3 ft7.09 m |
| Waterline length | 12.1 ft3.68 m | 19.6 ft5.97 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 2.3 ft0.69 m |
| Displacement | 478 lb217 kg | 2,450 lb1,111 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 800 lb363 kg |
| Sail area | 134 ft²12.4 m² | 236 ft²21.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 35.07 | 20.78 |
| Displacement / Length | 121 | 146 |
| Comfort ratio | 4.1 | 11.5 |
| Capsize screening | 3.58 | 2.37 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 4.7 | 5.9 |
Hunter 170 vs Hunter 23: the short version
- The Hunter 23 is the larger boat at 23.3 ft7.09 m LOA versus 17.1 ft5.21 m for the Hunter 170.
- The Hunter 23 is heavier, displacing about 413% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 170 carries the more powerful rig (35.1 vs 20.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 23 rates better for offshore work (2.37 vs 3.58).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.