Hunter 170 vs Hunter 27 Edge
How do the Hunter 170 and Hunter 27 Edge compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 170 | Hunter 170 | Hunter 27 Edge | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 17.1 ft5.21 m | 26.4 ft8.03 m |
| Waterline length | 12.1 ft3.68 m | 24.2 ft7.37 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 8.3 ft2.54 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 478 lb217 kg | 3,450 lb1,565 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 1,600 lb726 kg |
| Sail area | 134 ft²12.4 m² | 288 ft²26.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 35.07 | 20.18 |
| Displacement / Length | 121 | 109 |
| Comfort ratio | 4.1 | 12.7 |
| Capsize screening | 3.58 | 2.21 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 4.7 | 6.6 |
Hunter 170 vs Hunter 27 Edge: the short version
- The Hunter 27 Edge is the larger boat at 26.4 ft8.03 m LOA versus 17.1 ft5.21 m for the Hunter 170.
- The Hunter 27 Edge is heavier, displacing about 622% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 170 carries the more powerful rig (35.1 vs 20.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 27 Edge scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 27 Edge rates better for offshore work (2.21 vs 3.58).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.