Hunter 170 vs Hunter 36 Legend
How do the Hunter 170 and Hunter 36 Legend compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 170 
Hunter 36 Legend | Hunter 170 | Hunter 36 Legend | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 17.1 ft5.21 m | 35.7 ft10.89 m |
| Waterline length | 12.1 ft3.68 m | 31.5 ft9.61 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 12.3 ft3.76 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 6.8 ft2.08 m |
| Displacement | 478 lb217 kg | 14,330 lb6,500 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 5,132 lb2,328 kg |
| Sail area | 134 ft²12.4 m² | 632 ft²58.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 35.07 | 17.14 |
| Displacement / Length | 121 | 204 |
| Comfort ratio | 4.1 | 23.8 |
| Capsize screening | 3.58 | 2.03 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 4.7 | 7.5 |
Hunter 170 vs Hunter 36 Legend: the short version
- The Hunter 36 Legend is the larger boat at 35.7 ft10.89 m LOA versus 17.1 ft5.21 m for the Hunter 170.
- The Hunter 36 Legend is heavier, displacing about 2898% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 170 carries the more powerful rig (35.1 vs 17.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 36 Legend scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 36 Legend rates better for offshore work (2.03 vs 3.58).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.