Hunter 170 vs Hunter 37.5 Legend
How do the Hunter 170 and Hunter 37.5 Legend compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 170 | Hunter 170 | Hunter 37.5 Legend | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 17.1 ft5.21 m | 37.0 ft11.28 m |
| Waterline length | 12.1 ft3.68 m | 31.8 ft9.68 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 12.8 ft3.89 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.8 ft1.45 m |
| Displacement | 478 lb217 kg | 16,400 lb7,439 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 5,900 lb2,676 kg |
| Sail area | 134 ft²12.4 m² | 704 ft²65.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 35.07 | 17.45 |
| Displacement / Length | 121 | 229 |
| Comfort ratio | 4.1 | 25.6 |
| Capsize screening | 3.58 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 4.7 | 7.6 |
Hunter 170 vs Hunter 37.5 Legend: the short version
- The Hunter 37.5 Legend is the larger boat at 37.0 ft11.28 m LOA versus 17.1 ft5.21 m for the Hunter 170.
- The Hunter 37.5 Legend is heavier, displacing about 3331% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 170 carries the more powerful rig (35.1 vs 17.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 37.5 Legend scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 37.5 Legend rates better for offshore work (2.01 vs 3.58).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.