Hunter 18.5 vs Hunter 336
How do the Hunter 18.5 and Hunter 336 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 18.5 | Hunter 18.5 | Hunter 336 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.4 ft5.61 m | 33.5 ft10.21 m |
| Waterline length | 15.5 ft4.72 m | 28.6 ft8.71 m |
| Beam | 7.1 ft2.16 m | 11.7 ft3.56 m |
| Draft | 2.0 ft0.61 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 1,600 lb726 kg | 11,030 lb5,003 kg |
| Ballast | 520 lb236 kg | 4,100 lb1,860 kg |
| Sail area | 152 ft²14.1 m² | 574 ft²53.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.78 | 18.53 |
| Displacement / Length | 192 | 211 |
| Comfort ratio | 11.1 | 21.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.42 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 7.2 |
Hunter 18.5 vs Hunter 336: the short version
- The Hunter 336 is the larger boat at 33.5 ft10.21 m LOA versus 18.4 ft5.61 m for the Hunter 18.5.
- The Hunter 336 is heavier, displacing about 589% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 336 carries the more powerful rig (18.5 vs 17.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 336 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 336 rates better for offshore work (2.10 vs 2.42).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.