Hunter 18.5 vs Hunter Passage 450
How do the Hunter 18.5 and Hunter Passage 450 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 18.5 | Hunter 18.5 | Hunter Passage 450 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.4 ft5.61 m | 44.3 ft13.49 m |
| Waterline length | 15.5 ft4.72 m | 38.6 ft11.76 m |
| Beam | 7.1 ft2.16 m | 14.0 ft4.27 m |
| Draft | 2.0 ft0.61 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 1,600 lb726 kg | 26,180 lb11,875 kg |
| Ballast | 520 lb236 kg | 9,680 lb4,391 kg |
| Sail area | 152 ft²14.1 m² | 884 ft²82.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.78 | 16.04 |
| Displacement / Length | 192 | 204 |
| Comfort ratio | 11.1 | 29.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.42 | 1.89 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 8.3 |
Hunter 18.5 vs Hunter Passage 450: the short version
- The Hunter Passage 450 is the larger boat at 44.3 ft13.49 m LOA versus 18.4 ft5.61 m for the Hunter 18.5.
- The Hunter Passage 450 is heavier, displacing about 1536% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 18.5 carries the more powerful rig (17.8 vs 16.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter Passage 450 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter Passage 450 rates better for offshore work (1.89 vs 2.42).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.