Hunter 18.5 vs Hunter Xcite
How do the Hunter 18.5 and Hunter Xcite compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 18.5 | Hunter 18.5 | Hunter Xcite | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.4 ft5.61 m | 9.9 ft3.02 m |
| Waterline length | 15.5 ft4.72 m | —— |
| Beam | 7.1 ft2.16 m | 4.4 ft1.35 m |
| Draft | 2.0 ft0.61 m | 3.2 ft0.97 m |
| Displacement | 1,600 lb726 kg | 95 lb43 kg |
| Ballast | 520 lb236 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 152 ft²14.1 m² | 46 ft²4.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.78 | 35.35 |
| Displacement / Length | 192 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 11.1 | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.42 | 3.88 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | — |
Hunter 18.5 vs Hunter Xcite: the short version
- The Hunter 18.5 is the larger boat at 18.4 ft5.61 m LOA versus 9.9 ft3.02 m for the Hunter Xcite.
- The Hunter 18.5 is heavier, displacing about 1584% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter Xcite carries the more powerful rig (35.4 vs 17.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 18.5 rates better for offshore work (2.42 vs 3.88).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.