Hunter 19-1 vs Hunter 386
How do the Hunter 19-1 and Hunter 386 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-1 
Hunter 386 | Hunter 19-1 | Hunter 386 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.7 ft5.69 m | 38.3 ft11.66 m |
| Waterline length | 14.6 ft4.44 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Beam | 7.3 ft2.23 m | 12.6 ft3.83 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 1,250 lb567 kg | 16,000 lb7,257 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 5,900 lb2,676 kg |
| Sail area | 156 ft²14.5 m² | 740 ft²68.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.51 | 18.65 |
| Displacement / Length | 180 | 218 |
| Comfort ratio | 8.6 | 25.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.72 | 2.00 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.1 | 7.6 |
Hunter 19-1 vs Hunter 386: the short version
- The Hunter 386 is the larger boat at 38.3 ft11.66 m LOA versus 18.7 ft5.69 m for the Hunter 19-1.
- The Hunter 386 is heavier, displacing about 1180% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 19-1 carries the more powerful rig (21.5 vs 18.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 386 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 386 rates better for offshore work (2.00 vs 2.72).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.