Hunter 19-1 vs Hunter Passage 42
How do the Hunter 19-1 and Hunter Passage 42 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-1 
Hunter Passage 42 | Hunter 19-1 | Hunter Passage 42 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.7 ft5.69 m | 42.5 ft12.95 m |
| Waterline length | 14.6 ft4.44 m | 38.0 ft11.58 m |
| Beam | 7.3 ft2.23 m | 14.0 ft4.27 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 1,250 lb567 kg | 24,000 lb10,886 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 7,700 lb3,493 kg |
| Sail area | 156 ft²14.5 m² | 949 ft²88.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.51 | 18.25 |
| Displacement / Length | 180 | 195 |
| Comfort ratio | 8.6 | 28.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.72 | 1.94 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.1 | 8.3 |
Hunter 19-1 vs Hunter Passage 42: the short version
- The Hunter Passage 42 is the larger boat at 42.5 ft12.95 m LOA versus 18.7 ft5.69 m for the Hunter 19-1.
- The Hunter Passage 42 is heavier, displacing about 1820% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 19-1 carries the more powerful rig (21.5 vs 18.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter Passage 42 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter Passage 42 rates better for offshore work (1.94 vs 2.72).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.