Hunter 19-1 vs Moorings 295
How do the Hunter 19-1 and Moorings 295 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-1 | Hunter 19-1 | Moorings 295 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.7 ft5.69 m | 29.5 ft8.99 m |
| Waterline length | 14.6 ft4.44 m | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Beam | 7.3 ft2.23 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 1,250 lb567 kg | 7,500 lb3,402 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 2,680 lb1,216 kg |
| Sail area | 156 ft²14.5 m² | 400 ft²37.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.51 | 16.70 |
| Displacement / Length | 180 | 170 |
| Comfort ratio | 8.6 | 18.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.72 | 2.15 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.1 | 7.0 |
Hunter 19-1 vs Moorings 295: the short version
- The Moorings 295 is the larger boat at 29.5 ft8.99 m LOA versus 18.7 ft5.69 m for the Hunter 19-1.
- The Moorings 295 is heavier, displacing about 500% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 19-1 carries the more powerful rig (21.5 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Moorings 295 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Moorings 295 rates better for offshore work (2.15 vs 2.72).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.