Hunter 19-1 vs West Wight Potter 19
How do the Hunter 19-1 and West Wight Potter 19 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-1 
West Wight Potter 19 | Hunter 19-1 | West Wight Potter 19 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.7 ft5.69 m | 18.8 ft5.71 m |
| Waterline length | 14.6 ft4.44 m | 16.8 ft5.11 m |
| Beam | 7.3 ft2.23 m | 7.5 ft2.29 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 3.6 ft1.09 m |
| Displacement | 1,250 lb567 kg | 1,225 lb556 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 370 lb168 kg |
| Sail area | 156 ft²14.5 m² | 132 ft²12.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.51 | 18.45 |
| Displacement / Length | 180 | 116 |
| Comfort ratio | 8.6 | 7.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.72 | 2.80 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.1 | 5.5 |
Hunter 19-1 vs West Wight Potter 19: the short version
- The Hunter 19-1 and West Wight Potter 19 are close in length (18.7 ft5.69 m vs 18.8 ft5.71 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 19-1 carries the more powerful rig (21.5 vs 18.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 19-1 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 19-1 rates better for offshore work (2.72 vs 2.80).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.