Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 20
How do the Hunter 19-2 and Hunter 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Waterline length | 15.9 ft4.85 m | 15.5 ft4.72 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 7.5 ft2.29 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 1,700 lb771 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 400 lb181 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 169 ft²15.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 18.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 221 | 204 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.0 | 10.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 2.51 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 5.3 |
Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 20: the short version
- The Hunter 20 is the larger boat at 19.7 ft6.00 m LOA versus 19.0 ft5.79 m for the Hunter 19-2.
- The Hunter 19-2 is heavier, displacing about 18% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 20 carries the more powerful rig (19.0 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 19-2 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 19-2 rates better for offshore work (2.46 vs 2.51).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.