Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 212
How do the Hunter 19-2 and Hunter 212 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 212 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Waterline length | 15.9 ft4.85 m | 18.0 ft5.49 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 1,800 lb816 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 140 lb64 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 202 ft²18.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 21.84 |
| Displacement / Length | 221 | 138 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.0 | 7.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 3.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 5.7 |
Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 212: the short version
- The Hunter 212 is the larger boat at 21.0 ft6.40 m LOA versus 19.0 ft5.79 m for the Hunter 19-2.
- The Hunter 19-2 is heavier, displacing about 11% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 212 carries the more powerful rig (21.8 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 19-2 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 19-2 rates better for offshore work (2.46 vs 3.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.