Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 216
How do the Hunter 19-2 and Hunter 216 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 216 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Waterline length | 15.9 ft4.85 m | 18.8 ft5.72 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 1,351 lb613 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 500 lb227 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 208 ft²19.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 27.23 |
| Displacement / Length | 221 | 91 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.0 | 6.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 2.86 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 5.8 |
Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 216: the short version
- The Hunter 216 is the larger boat at 21.5 ft6.55 m LOA versus 19.0 ft5.79 m for the Hunter 19-2.
- The Hunter 19-2 is heavier, displacing about 48% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 216 carries the more powerful rig (27.2 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 19-2 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 19-2 rates better for offshore work (2.46 vs 2.86).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.