Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 240
How do the Hunter 19-2 and Hunter 240 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 240 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 24.1 ft7.34 m |
| Waterline length | 15.9 ft4.85 m | 22.1 ft6.73 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.3 ft2.51 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 3,600 lb1,633 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 1,300 lb590 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 236 ft²21.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 16.08 |
| Displacement / Length | 221 | 149 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.0 | 14.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 2.15 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 6.3 |
Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 240: the short version
- The Hunter 240 is the larger boat at 24.1 ft7.34 m LOA versus 19.0 ft5.79 m for the Hunter 19-2.
- The Hunter 240 is heavier, displacing about 80% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 19-2 carries the more powerful rig (16.8 vs 16.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 240 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 240 rates better for offshore work (2.15 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.