Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 26.5
How do the Hunter 19-2 and Hunter 26.5 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-2 
Hunter 26.5 | Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 26.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 26.6 ft8.10 m |
| Waterline length | 15.9 ft4.85 m | 22.4 ft6.83 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 9.0 ft2.74 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 4,400 lb1,996 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 1,800 lb816 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 304 ft²28.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 18.11 |
| Displacement / Length | 221 | 174 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.0 | 15.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 2.20 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 6.3 |
Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 26.5: the short version
- The Hunter 26.5 is the larger boat at 26.6 ft8.10 m LOA versus 19.0 ft5.79 m for the Hunter 19-2.
- The Hunter 26.5 is heavier, displacing about 120% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 26.5 carries the more powerful rig (18.1 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 26.5 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 26.5 rates better for offshore work (2.20 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.