Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 310
How do the Hunter 19-2 and Hunter 310 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-2 
Hunter 310 | Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 310 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 30.8 ft9.40 m |
| Waterline length | 15.9 ft4.85 m | 28.0 ft8.53 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 10.8 ft3.30 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 8,500 lb3,856 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 464 ft²43.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 17.82 |
| Displacement / Length | 221 | 173 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.0 | 19.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 2.12 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 7.1 |
Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 310: the short version
- The Hunter 310 is the larger boat at 30.8 ft9.40 m LOA versus 19.0 ft5.79 m for the Hunter 19-2.
- The Hunter 310 is heavier, displacing about 325% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 310 carries the more powerful rig (17.8 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 310 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 310 rates better for offshore work (2.12 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.