Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 32 Vision
How do the Hunter 19-2 and Hunter 32 Vision compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-2 
Hunter 32 Vision | Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 32 Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Waterline length | 15.9 ft4.85 m | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 11.3 ft3.45 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 11,400 lb5,171 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 486 ft²45.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 15.35 |
| Displacement / Length | 221 | 259 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.0 | 24.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 7.0 |
Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 32 Vision: the short version
- The Hunter 32 Vision is the larger boat at 32.0 ft9.75 m LOA versus 19.0 ft5.79 m for the Hunter 19-2.
- The Hunter 32 Vision is heavier, displacing about 470% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 19-2 carries the more powerful rig (16.8 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 32 Vision scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 32 Vision rates better for offshore work (2.01 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.