Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 333
How do the Hunter 19-2 and Hunter 333 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 333 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 33.2 ft10.11 m |
| Waterline length | 15.9 ft4.85 m | 26.8 ft8.18 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 10.0 ft3.05 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 10,500 lb4,763 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 4,000 lb1,814 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 522 ft²48.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 17.42 |
| Displacement / Length | 221 | 243 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.0 | 26.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 1.83 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 6.9 |
Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 333: the short version
- The Hunter 333 is the larger boat at 33.2 ft10.11 m LOA versus 19.0 ft5.79 m for the Hunter 19-2.
- The Hunter 333 is heavier, displacing about 425% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 333 carries the more powerful rig (17.4 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 333 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 333 rates better for offshore work (1.83 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.