Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 34
How do the Hunter 19-2 and Hunter 34 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-2 
Hunter 34 | Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 34 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 34.4 ft10.49 m |
| Waterline length | 15.9 ft4.85 m | 28.3 ft8.61 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 11.6 ft3.53 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 11,820 lb5,361 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 5,000 lb2,268 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 567 ft²52.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 17.48 |
| Displacement / Length | 221 | 234 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.0 | 23.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 2.03 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 7.1 |
Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 34: the short version
- The Hunter 34 is the larger boat at 34.4 ft10.49 m LOA versus 19.0 ft5.79 m for the Hunter 19-2.
- The Hunter 34 is heavier, displacing about 491% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 34 carries the more powerful rig (17.5 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 34 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 34 rates better for offshore work (2.03 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.