Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 36 Vision
How do the Hunter 19-2 and Hunter 36 Vision compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 36 Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 36.0 ft10.97 m |
| Waterline length | 15.9 ft4.85 m | 31.0 ft9.45 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 12.8 ft3.89 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 4.7 ft1.42 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 15,500 lb7,031 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 5,900 lb2,676 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 677 ft²62.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 17.42 |
| Displacement / Length | 221 | 232 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.0 | 24.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 2.05 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 7.5 |
Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 36 Vision: the short version
- The Hunter 36 Vision is the larger boat at 36.0 ft10.97 m LOA versus 19.0 ft5.79 m for the Hunter 19-2.
- The Hunter 36 Vision is heavier, displacing about 675% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 36 Vision carries the more powerful rig (17.4 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 36 Vision scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 36 Vision rates better for offshore work (2.05 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.