Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 37
How do the Hunter 19-2 and Hunter 37 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 37 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 37.0 ft11.28 m |
| Waterline length | 15.9 ft4.85 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 11.8 ft3.61 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 5.1 ft1.55 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 17,800 lb8,074 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 6,850 lb3,107 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 649 ft²60.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 15.23 |
| Displacement / Length | 221 | 294 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.0 | 31.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 1.82 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 7.3 |
Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 37: the short version
- The Hunter 37 is the larger boat at 37.0 ft11.28 m LOA versus 19.0 ft5.79 m for the Hunter 19-2.
- The Hunter 37 is heavier, displacing about 790% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 19-2 carries the more powerful rig (16.8 vs 15.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 37 rates better for offshore work (1.82 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.