Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 410
How do the Hunter 19-2 and Hunter 410 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-2 
Hunter 410 | Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 410 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 43.4 ft13.23 m |
| Waterline length | 15.9 ft4.85 m | 37.8 ft11.53 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 13.8 ft4.22 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 20,200 lb9,163 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 7,400 lb3,357 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 822 ft²76.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 17.73 |
| Displacement / Length | 221 | 167 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.0 | 23.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 2.03 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 8.2 |
Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 410: the short version
- The Hunter 410 is the larger boat at 43.4 ft13.23 m LOA versus 19.0 ft5.79 m for the Hunter 19-2.
- The Hunter 410 is heavier, displacing about 910% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 410 carries the more powerful rig (17.7 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 410 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 410 rates better for offshore work (2.03 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.