Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 466
How do the Hunter 19-2 and Hunter 466 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 466 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 46.1 ft14.05 m |
| Waterline length | 15.9 ft4.85 m | 39.7 ft12.09 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 14.0 ft4.27 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 26,180 lb11,875 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 9,680 lb4,391 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 933 ft²86.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 16.93 |
| Displacement / Length | 221 | 187 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.0 | 29.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 1.89 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 8.4 |
Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 466: the short version
- The Hunter 466 is the larger boat at 46.1 ft14.05 m LOA versus 19.0 ft5.79 m for the Hunter 19-2.
- The Hunter 466 is heavier, displacing about 1209% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 466 carries the more powerful rig (16.9 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 466 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 466 rates better for offshore work (1.89 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.