Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 49
How do the Hunter 19-2 and Hunter 49 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 49 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 49.9 ft15.22 m |
| Waterline length | 15.9 ft4.85 m | 43.8 ft13.36 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 14.8 ft4.50 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 32,813 lb14,884 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 12,544 lb5,690 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 1,013 ft²94.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 15.81 |
| Displacement / Length | 221 | 174 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.0 | 30.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 1.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 8.9 |
Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter 49: the short version
- The Hunter 49 is the larger boat at 49.9 ft15.22 m LOA versus 19.0 ft5.79 m for the Hunter 19-2.
- The Hunter 49 is heavier, displacing about 1541% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 19-2 carries the more powerful rig (16.8 vs 15.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 49 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 49 rates better for offshore work (1.84 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.