Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter HC 50
How do the Hunter 19-2 and Hunter HC 50 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 19-2 | Hunter HC 50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 50.0 ft15.24 m |
| Waterline length | 15.9 ft4.85 m | 45.0 ft13.72 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 15.0 ft4.57 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 5.8 ft1.78 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 18,000 lb8,165 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 5,600 lb2,540 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 1,274 ft²118.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 29.68 |
| Displacement / Length | 221 | 88 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.0 | 16.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 2.29 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 9.0 |
Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter HC 50: the short version
- The Hunter HC 50 is the larger boat at 50.0 ft15.24 m LOA versus 19.0 ft5.79 m for the Hunter 19-2.
- The Hunter HC 50 is heavier, displacing about 800% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter HC 50 carries the more powerful rig (29.7 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter HC 50 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter HC 50 rates better for offshore work (2.29 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.