Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter Xcite
How do the Hunter 19-2 and Hunter Xcite compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 19-2 | Hunter Xcite | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 9.9 ft3.02 m |
| Waterline length | 15.9 ft4.85 m | —— |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 4.4 ft1.35 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 3.2 ft0.97 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 95 lb43 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 46 ft²4.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 35.35 |
| Displacement / Length | 221 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 12.0 | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 3.88 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | — |
Hunter 19-2 vs Hunter Xcite: the short version
- The Hunter 19-2 is the larger boat at 19.0 ft5.79 m LOA versus 9.9 ft3.02 m for the Hunter Xcite.
- The Hunter 19-2 is heavier, displacing about 2005% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter Xcite carries the more powerful rig (35.4 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 19-2 rates better for offshore work (2.46 vs 3.88).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.