Hunter 19-2 vs Mirror Offshore MK1
How do the Hunter 19-2 and Mirror Offshore MK1 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 19-2 | Mirror Offshore MK1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 18.9 ft5.75 m |
| Waterline length | 15.9 ft4.85 m | 15.8 ft4.80 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 6.7 ft2.05 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 1.9 ft0.58 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 1,799 lb816 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 379 lb172 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 122 ft²11.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 13.20 |
| Displacement / Length | 221 | 206 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.0 | 13.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 2.21 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Average used price | — | €900 |
Hunter 19-2 vs Mirror Offshore MK1: the short version
- The Hunter 19-2 and Mirror Offshore MK1 are close in length (19.0 ft5.79 m vs 18.9 ft5.75 m ).
- The Hunter 19-2 is heavier, displacing about 11% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 19-2 carries the more powerful rig (16.8 vs 13.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Mirror Offshore MK1 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Mirror Offshore MK1 rates better for offshore work (2.21 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.