Hunter 19-2 vs Moorings 295
How do the Hunter 19-2 and Moorings 295 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 19-2 | Hunter 19-2 | Moorings 295 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 29.5 ft8.99 m |
| Waterline length | 15.9 ft4.85 m | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 7,500 lb3,402 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 2,680 lb1,216 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 400 ft²37.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 16.70 |
| Displacement / Length | 221 | 170 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.0 | 18.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 2.15 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 7.0 |
Hunter 19-2 vs Moorings 295: the short version
- The Moorings 295 is the larger boat at 29.5 ft8.99 m LOA versus 19.0 ft5.79 m for the Hunter 19-2.
- The Moorings 295 is heavier, displacing about 275% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 19-2 carries the more powerful rig (16.8 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Moorings 295 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Moorings 295 rates better for offshore work (2.15 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.