Hunter 20 vs Kelt 550
How do the Hunter 20 and Kelt 550 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 20 
Kelt 550 | Hunter 20 | Kelt 550 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.6 ft5.97 m |
| Waterline length | 15.5 ft4.72 m | 17.2 ft5.25 m |
| Beam | 7.5 ft2.29 m | 8.0 ft2.45 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 3.6 ft1.10 m |
| Displacement | 1,700 lb771 kg | 1,190 lb540 kg |
| Ballast | 400 lb181 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 169 ft²15.7 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 18.98 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 204 | 104 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.7 | 6.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.51 | 3.03 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 5.6 |
Hunter 20 vs Kelt 550: the short version
- The Hunter 20 and Kelt 550 are close in length (19.7 ft6.00 m vs 19.6 ft5.97 m ).
- The Hunter 20 is heavier, displacing about 43% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Hunter 20 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 20 rates better for offshore work (2.51 vs 3.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.