Hunter 20 vs Sunwind 20
How do the Hunter 20 and Sunwind 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 20 | Hunter 20 | Sunwind 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Waterline length | 15.5 ft4.72 m | 16.4 ft5.00 m |
| Beam | 7.5 ft2.29 m | 8.0 ft2.45 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 4.1 ft1.25 m |
| Displacement | 1,700 lb771 kg | 3,527 lb1,600 kg |
| Ballast | 400 lb181 kg | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | 169 ft²15.7 m² | 226 ft²21.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.98 | 15.61 |
| Displacement / Length | 204 | 357 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.7 | 19.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.51 | 2.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Average used price | — | €900 |
Hunter 20 vs Sunwind 20: the short version
- The Hunter 20 and Sunwind 20 are close in length (19.7 ft6.00 m vs 19.7 ft6.00 m ).
- The Sunwind 20 is heavier, displacing about 107% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 20 carries the more powerful rig (19.0 vs 15.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Sunwind 20 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Sunwind 20 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.51).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.