Hunter 22 vs Santana 22
How do the Hunter 22 and Santana 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 22 | Hunter 22 | Santana 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.2 ft6.78 m | 22.3 ft6.78 m |
| Waterline length | 18.3 ft5.59 m | 18.8 ft5.71 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 7.5 ft2.29 m |
| Draft | 3.2 ft0.96 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 3,400 lb1,542 kg | 2,600 lb1,179 kg |
| Ballast | 1,400 lb635 kg | 1,230 lb558 kg |
| Sail area | 219 ft²20.3 m² | 218 ft²20.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.50 | 18.45 |
| Displacement / Length | 246 | 176 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.1 | 13.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.11 | 2.18 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 5.8 |
Hunter 22 vs Santana 22: the short version
- The Hunter 22 and Santana 22 are close in length (22.2 ft6.78 m vs 22.3 ft6.78 m ).
- The Hunter 22 is heavier, displacing about 31% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Santana 22 carries the more powerful rig (18.4 vs 15.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 22 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.