Hunter 240 vs Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24
How do the Hunter 240 and Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 240 | Hunter 240 | Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.1 ft7.34 m | 24.1 ft7.35 m |
| Waterline length | 22.1 ft6.73 m | 19.9 ft6.05 m |
| Beam | 8.3 ft2.51 m | 7.5 ft2.30 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 3.9 ft1.20 m |
| Displacement | 3,600 lb1,633 kg | 4,079 lb1,850 kg |
| Ballast | 1,300 lb590 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 236 ft²21.9 m² | 301 ft²28.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.08 | 18.86 |
| Displacement / Length | 149 | 233 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.8 | 20.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.15 | 1.89 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.0 |
| Average used price | — | €2,970 |
Hunter 240 vs Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24: the short version
- The Hunter 240 and Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 are close in length (24.1 ft7.34 m vs 24.1 ft7.35 m ).
- The Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 is heavier, displacing about 13% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 carries the more powerful rig (18.9 vs 16.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 rates better for offshore work (1.89 vs 2.15).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.