Hunter 25-2 vs Sirius 26
How do the Hunter 25-2 and Sirius 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 25-2 
Sirius 26 | Hunter 25-2 | Sirius 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.5 ft7.47 m | 24.4 ft7.44 m |
| Waterline length | 22.1 ft6.73 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Beam | 8.5 ft2.58 m | 9.4 ft2.87 m |
| Draft | 2.0 ft0.61 m | 3.2 ft0.97 m |
| Displacement | 3,700 lb1,678 kg | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Ballast | 1,309 lb594 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 218 ft²20.3 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 14.58 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 153 | 189 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.6 | 15.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.19 | 2.28 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.3 |
Hunter 25-2 vs Sirius 26: the short version
- The Hunter 25-2 and Sirius 26 are close in length (24.5 ft7.47 m vs 24.4 ft7.44 m ).
- The Sirius 26 is heavier, displacing about 22% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Sirius 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 25-2 rates better for offshore work (2.19 vs 2.28).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.