Hunter 260 vs Yamaha 26
How do the Hunter 260 and Yamaha 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 260 
Yamaha 26 | Hunter 260 | Yamaha 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.3 ft8.00 m | 26.2 ft7.98 m |
| Waterline length | 23.3 ft7.09 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.73 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Draft | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 5.1 ft1.55 m |
| Displacement | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 4,343 lb1,970 kg |
| Ballast | 2,000 lb907 kg | 1,433 lb650 kg |
| Sail area | 299 ft²27.8 m² | 290 ft²26.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.36 | 17.43 |
| Displacement / Length | 178 | 209 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.2 | 15.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.10 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.1 |
Hunter 260 vs Yamaha 26: the short version
- The Hunter 260 and Yamaha 26 are close in length (26.3 ft8.00 m vs 26.2 ft7.98 m ).
- The Hunter 260 is heavier, displacing about 15% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Yamaha 26 carries the more powerful rig (17.4 vs 16.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 260 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 260 rates better for offshore work (2.10 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.