Hunter 270 vs Nord 80
How do the Hunter 270 and Nord 80 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 270 | Hunter 270 | Nord 80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.3 ft8.00 m | 26.3 ft8.00 m |
| Waterline length | 23.3 ft7.09 m | 22.0 ft6.70 m |
| Beam | 8.9 ft2.73 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 4.4 ft1.35 m |
| Displacement | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 6,393 lb2,900 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 2,425 lb1,100 kg |
| Sail area | 284 ft²26.4 m² | 344 ft²32.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.54 | 15.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 178 | 269 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.3 | 22.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 1.98 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.3 |
| Average used price | — | €6,900 |
Hunter 270 vs Nord 80: the short version
- The Hunter 270 and Nord 80 are close in length (26.3 ft8.00 m vs 26.3 ft8.00 m ).
- The Nord 80 is heavier, displacing about 28% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Nord 80 carries the more powerful rig (16.0 vs 15.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nord 80 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nord 80 rates better for offshore work (1.98 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.