Hunter 30 vs Knarr
How do the Hunter 30 and Knarr compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 30 
Knarr | Hunter 30 | Knarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.4 ft9.27 m | 30.4 ft9.28 m |
| Waterline length | 25.8 ft7.85 m | 20.4 ft6.21 m |
| Beam | 10.2 ft3.10 m | 7.0 ft2.12 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 9,700 lb4,400 kg | 4,905 lb2,225 kg |
| Ballast | 4,100 lb1,860 kg | 2,822 lb1,280 kg |
| Sail area | 453 ft²42.1 m² | 255 ft²23.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.94 | 14.13 |
| Displacement / Length | 254 | 259 |
| Comfort ratio | 25.1 | 24.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.91 | 1.64 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.8 | 6.0 |
Hunter 30 vs Knarr: the short version
- The Hunter 30 and Knarr are close in length (30.4 ft9.27 m vs 30.4 ft9.28 m ).
- The Hunter 30 is heavier, displacing about 98% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 30 carries the more powerful rig (15.9 vs 14.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Knarr rates better for offshore work (1.64 vs 1.91).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.