Hunter 30 vs Southern Cross 28
How do the Hunter 30 and Southern Cross 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 30 | Hunter 30 | Southern Cross 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.4 ft9.27 m | 30.4 ft9.27 m |
| Waterline length | 25.8 ft7.85 m | 20.2 ft6.15 m |
| Beam | 10.2 ft3.10 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 4.7 ft1.42 m |
| Displacement | 9,700 lb4,400 kg | 8,500 lb3,856 kg |
| Ballast | 4,100 lb1,860 kg | 3,400 lb1,542 kg |
| Sail area | 453 ft²42.1 m² | 415 ft²38.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.94 | 15.94 |
| Displacement / Length | 254 | 462 |
| Comfort ratio | 25.1 | 32.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.91 | 1.67 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.8 | 6.0 |
Hunter 30 vs Southern Cross 28: the short version
- The Hunter 30 and Southern Cross 28 are close in length (30.4 ft9.27 m vs 30.4 ft9.27 m ).
- The Hunter 30 is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Southern Cross 28 carries the more powerful rig (15.9 vs 15.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Southern Cross 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Southern Cross 28 rates better for offshore work (1.67 vs 1.91).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.