Hunter 31-2 vs Leigh 30
How do the Hunter 31-2 and Leigh 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 31-2 
Leigh 30 | Hunter 31-2 | Leigh 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.0 ft9.14 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Waterline length | 28.1 ft8.56 m | 23.3 ft7.11 m |
| Beam | 11.1 ft3.38 m | 9.8 ft2.97 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.19 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 8,505 lb3,858 kg | 9,100 lb4,128 kg |
| Ballast | 2,571 lb1,166 kg | 4,400 lb1,996 kg |
| Sail area | 351 ft²32.6 m² | 420 ft²39.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.48 | 15.42 |
| Displacement / Length | 171 | 320 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.6 | 26.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.17 | 1.87 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.1 | 6.5 |
Hunter 31-2 vs Leigh 30: the short version
- The Hunter 31-2 and Leigh 30 are close in length (30.0 ft9.14 m vs 30.0 ft9.14 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Leigh 30 carries the more powerful rig (15.4 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Leigh 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Leigh 30 rates better for offshore work (1.87 vs 2.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.